🤝 Issue
Society, secularism and regions: what each candidate thinks
By Fadrique Garcia Font · Reviewed on 19/10/2026
The 2026 assisted dying law, letting Corsica make its own rules in some areas, and girls under 18 wearing the headscarf in public spaces.
3 questions, 33 candidate positions and 3 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each candidate proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their programmes, statements and the votes of their party’s group. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”; “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Agrees: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Disagrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
Agrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
Disagrees: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Agrees: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Disagrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
Disagrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
In between: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Agrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
Disagrees: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Agrees: “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
Disagrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”
In between: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Disagrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
In between: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Agrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”
Disagrees: “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”; “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Agrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
Disagrees: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Agrees: “Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces”
Disagrees: “The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept”; “Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas”
The 2026 law allowing assisted dying should be kept.
On 15 July 2026 Parliament gave final approval to a law creating a right to assisted dying for some patients, under strict conditions.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 5 in favour, 0 in between and 6 against.
-
Attal Strongly in favourMessage de Gabriel Attal après le vote définitif de la loi sur la fin de vie, 15 juillet 2026 Why
-
Dupont-Aignan AgainstCommuniqué « Non à une société de l’élimination silencieuse ! », debout-la-france.fr, 27 mai 2025 Why
-
Glucksmann In favourVote du groupe Socialistes à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8280, 15 juillet 2026 Why
-
Le Pen AgainstVote de Marine Le Pen à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8280, 15 juillet 2026 Why
-
Lisnard Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Mélenchon Strongly in favourL’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 4 (archive du 7 mai 2026) Why
-
Philippe AgainstVote du groupe Horizons & Indépendants à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8280, 15 juillet 2026 Why
-
Retailleau AgainstVote de Bruno Retailleau au Sénat, scrutin n° 265, 11 mai 2026 Why
-
Roussel In favourVote du groupe GDR à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8280, 15 juillet 2026 Why
-
Tondelier Strongly in favourProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 37, mesure 1, p. 130 Why
-
Zemmour Strongly againstfranceinfo, 17 juillet 2026 Why
Corsica should be able to make its own rules in some areas.
A constitutional amendment for an “autonomous Corsica within the Republic” was passed at first reading in the National Assembly in June 2026. It still has to go through the Senate and Congress.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 5 in favour, 0 in between and 6 against.
-
Attal In favourVote de Gabriel Attal à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 7454, 23 juin 2026 Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly againstCommuniqué « Corse, l’engrenage d’une France fragmentée », debout-la-france.fr, 26 juin 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann In favourVote du groupe Socialistes à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 7454, 23 juin 2026 Why
-
Le Pen AgainstVote de Marine Le Pen à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 7454, 23 juin 2026 Why
-
Lisnard AgainstDiscours de Bayeux, 17 juin 2026, p. 11 Why
-
Mélenchon In favourL’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 1 (archive du 2 juillet 2026) Why
-
Philippe In favourVote du groupe Horizons & Indépendants à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 7454, 23 juin 2026 Why
-
Retailleau Against« Je serai la surprise de cette élection », entretien repris sur republicains.fr, 1er juillet 2026 Why
-
Roussel Strongly against« Un communisme de conquêtes », base commune du 40e congrès du PCF, juillet 2026, § 2.2.2, p. 10 Why
-
Tondelier Strongly in favourProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 22, mesure 2, p. 87, et chap. 48, mesure 6, p. 160 Why
-
Zemmour Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Girls under 18 should not be allowed to wear the headscarf in public spaces.
Conspicuous religious symbols have been banned in state schools since 2004, and face-covering veils in public spaces since 2010. The headscarf remains allowed in the street.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 3 in between and 4 against.
-
Attal In favourEntretien sur BFM TV, 6 septembre 2026 (compte rendu de campagne) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Glucksmann AgainstLCP, 14 janvier 2026 (position du groupe Socialistes en commission des lois) Why
-
Le Pen In favourHespress, 10 septembre 2026 Why
-
Lisnard In betweenProgramme de Nouvelle Énergie, page thématique « Sécurité » (site du parti) Why
-
Mélenchon Strongly againstLCP, « Voile des mineures : le texte de Laurent Wauquiez […] rejeté en commission », 14 janvier 2026 Why
-
Philippe In between
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Retailleau In between« Les pressions ne marchent pas avec moi, rien ne m’arrêtera », entretien au JDD repris sur republicains.fr, 12 septembre 2026 Why
-
Roussel AgainstLCP, « Voile des mineures : le texte de Laurent Wauquiez […] rejeté en commission », 14 janvier 2026 Why
-
Tondelier Strongly againstProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 54, introduction, p. 172 Why
-
Zemmour Strongly in favourProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 10 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 3 of them the candidates hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test