🏥 Issue
Health: what each candidate thinks
By Fadrique Garcia Font · Reviewed on 19/10/2026
Requiring doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them, and funding for public hospitals.
2 questions, 22 candidate positions and 1 complete disagreement (how they are assigned).
What each candidate proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their programmes, statements and the votes of their party’s group. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Disagrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”; “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Agrees: “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Disagrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”
Agrees: “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
In between: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”
Agrees: “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Disagrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”
Disagrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”; “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Agrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”; “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Disagrees: “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
In between: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”
Agrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”
Disagrees: “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Agrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”; “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Agrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”; “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Agrees: “Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more”
Disagrees: “The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them”
The State should be able to require doctors to set up practice in areas that lack them.
Doctors in private practice are free to choose where to work. A cross-party bill to regulate where they set up was passed at first reading in the National Assembly in May 2025.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 2 in between and 5 against.
-
Attal Strongly againstDébats avec les Français à Blois et à Bourges, 5 octobre 2026 (compte rendu de campagne) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan AgainstProjet de Debout la France « Santé », version du 5 février 2024 Why
-
Glucksmann In between« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 50 Why
-
Le Pen AgainstProjet présidentiel 2022 « La santé », p. 14 Why
-
Lisnard Strongly againstLes carnets : Santé, Nouvelle Énergie, 2026, p. 8 Why
-
Mélenchon In favourL’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 15 (archive du 6 mai 2026) Why
-
Philippe In betweenPublic Sénat, « Édouard Philippe présente son plan contre les déserts médicaux », 13 octobre 2017 Why
-
Retailleau In favourVote du groupe Droite républicaine à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 1607, 7 mai 2025 Why
-
Roussel In favour« La France des Jours heureux », programme présidentiel 2022, proposition 13, p. 15 Why
-
Tondelier In favourProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 45, mesure 2, p. 151 Why
-
Zemmour AgainstProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 53 Why
Funding for public hospitals should be greatly increased, even if it costs the State more.
Public hospitals are short of staff and beds in many areas. Their budget depends on the health insurance spending target voted each year.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 7 in favour, 0 in between and 4 against.
-
Attal Against« Dette de l’État », site de campagne attalpresident.fr (consulté le 19 octobre 2026) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan In favourProjet de Debout la France « Santé », version du 5 février 2024 Why
-
Glucksmann In favour« Lettre aux Français », place-publique.eu, 25 août 2026 Why
-
Le Pen In favourProgramme présidentiel 2022, 22 mesures, p. 6 Why
-
Lisnard Strongly againstProgramme de Nouvelle Énergie, page thématique « Santé » (site du parti) Why
-
Mélenchon Strongly in favourComment nous allons remettre de l’ordre dans les comptes publics, octobre 2026, p. 10 Why
-
Philippe AgainstPriorités « Pour une France plus prospère », site de campagne edouardphilippe.fr (consulté le 19 octobre 2026) Why
-
Retailleau AgainstPublic Sénat, « Bruno Retailleau s’engage sur un plan d’économies de près de 200 milliards d’euros », 12 octobre 2026 Why
-
Roussel Strongly in favour« La France des Jours heureux », programme présidentiel 2022, proposition 14, p. 16 Why
-
Tondelier In favourProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 30, mesures 1 à 4, p. 114 Why
-
Zemmour In favourProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 53 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 1 of them the candidates hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test