🛡️ Issue
Foreign affairs and defence: what each candidate thinks
By Fadrique Garcia Font · Reviewed on 19/10/2026
Military aid to Ukraine, NATO’s integrated command, extending the nuclear deterrent to European partners, compulsory national service and military spending.
5 questions, 55 candidate positions and 3 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each candidate proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their programmes, statements and the votes of their party’s group. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”
Agrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”
Agrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”
Agrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”
In between: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”
Agrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”
Agrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”
Disagrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “France should increase its military spending”
Agrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”
Agrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”
Agrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”
Disagrees: “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”; “France should increase its military spending”
In between: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”
Agrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”
Agrees: “France should leave NATO’s integrated military command”; “France should increase its military spending”
Disagrees: “France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine”; “France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners”; “There should be compulsory national service for all young people”
France should continue to give military aid to Ukraine.
Since Russia’s invasion in 2022, France has been giving Ukraine weapons, ammunition and military training.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 2 in between and 3 against.
-
Attal Strongly in favourChantier « Frontières », site de campagne attalpresident.fr (consulté le 19 octobre 2026) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly againstEntretien sur BFMTV, 21 septembre 2026 (dupontaignan.fr) Why
-
Glucksmann Strongly in favour« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 11 Why
-
Le Pen In betweenPublic Sénat, 24 septembre 2026 Why
-
Lisnard In favourNouvelle Énergie, fiche « Quelle est la position de David Lisnard sur la guerre en Ukraine ? » (Sud Radio, 29 février 2024 ; TF1, 5 mars 2025) Why
-
Mélenchon AgainstBlog de Jean-Luc Mélenchon, « En Alaska, le début cruel d’un nouvel ordre du monde », 14 août 2025 Why
-
Philippe Strongly in favourfranceinfo, compte rendu de « L’Heure de vérité » (France 2), 8 octobre 2026 Why
-
Retailleau In favour« L’unité nationale, première de nos armes », tribune reprise sur republicains.fr, 14 juillet 2026 Why
-
Roussel In betweenSud Radio, « L’invité politique », « Ukraine : "Je ne veux pas que la France entre en guerre contre la Russie" », 7 mars 2024 Why
-
Tondelier Strongly in favourProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 62, mesure 2, p. 197 Why
-
Zemmour AgainstBFMTV, « Face à BFM », 17 septembre 2026 Why
France should leave NATO’s integrated military command.
France left NATO’s integrated military command in 1966 and rejoined it in 2009, while remaining a member of the Alliance throughout.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 5 in favour, 0 in between and 6 against.
-
Attal AgainstEnsemble pour la République, programme des législatives 2024 « Notre projet », p. 11 Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly in favourProjet de Debout la France « Affaires étrangères », mis à jour le 16 février 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Le Pen Strongly in favourReuters (via bdnews24), 22 mai 2026 Why
-
Lisnard Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Mélenchon Strongly in favourL’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 16 (archive du 8 mai 2026) Why
-
Philippe AgainstDiscours au Conseil national d’Horizons, Reims, 10 mai 2026 Why
-
Retailleau Against« L’unité nationale, première de nos armes », tribune reprise sur republicains.fr, 14 juillet 2026 Why
-
Roussel Strongly in favour« Un communisme de conquêtes », base commune du 40e congrès du PCF, juillet 2026, § 2.1, p. 8 Why
-
Tondelier AgainstProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 61, introduction, p. 192 Why
-
Zemmour Strongly in favourProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 16 Why
France should offer to extend its nuclear deterrent to its European partners.
France is the only EU country with nuclear weapons. Only the President can decide to use them; the question is whether they should also protect European partners.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 0 in between and 7 against.
-
Attal Strongly in favourDiscours de Reims sur les États-Unis d’Europe, 17 septembre 2026, p. 20 Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly againstTribune « Je suis candidat pour rendre le pouvoir aux Français et rendre sa liberté à la France ! », debout-la-france.fr, 25 septembre 2025 Why
-
Glucksmann Strongly in favour« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 11 Why
-
Le Pen AgainstProgramme du RN aux législatives de 2024, p. 6 Why
-
Lisnard Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Mélenchon AgainstProgramme de La France insoumise pour les élections européennes de 2024, p. 95 Why
-
Philippe In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Retailleau Strongly against« La dissuasion nucléaire française ne se partage pas », tribune dans Le Journal du Dimanche reprise sur republicains.fr, 1er mars 2026 Why
-
Roussel Strongly against« Un communisme de conquêtes », base commune du 40e congrès du PCF, juillet 2026, § 2.1, p. 8 Why
-
Tondelier In favourProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 61, mesure 4, p. 194 Why
-
Zemmour Strongly againstProgramme de Reconquête aux européennes de 2024, p. 9 Why
There should be compulsory national service for all young people.
Compulsory military service has been suspended since 1997. A new, voluntary military national service started in 2026.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 0 in between and 7 against.
-
Attal In favourMesures présentées au meeting de Lyon, 10 octobre 2026 (site de campagne) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly in favourProjet de Debout la France « Défense nationale », mis à jour le 8 octobre 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann In favour« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 73 Why
-
Le Pen AgainstProgramme du RN aux législatives de 2024, p. 11 Why
-
Lisnard Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Mélenchon Strongly in favourL’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 5 (archive du 8 mai 2026) Why
-
Philippe AgainstPriorités « Pour une France plus sûre », site de campagne edouardphilippe.fr (consulté le 19 octobre 2026) Why
-
Retailleau AgainstPublic Sénat, « Bruno Retailleau s’engage sur un plan d’économies de près de 200 milliards d’euros », 12 octobre 2026 Why
-
Roussel Against« Un communisme de conquêtes », base commune du 40e congrès du PCF, juillet 2026, § 2.1, p. 8 Why
-
Tondelier AgainstProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 35, introduction (p. 125) et mesure 5, p. 126 Why
-
Zemmour AgainstProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 18 Why
France should increase its military spending.
The 2024-2030 military planning law, updated in 2026, already provides for a rise in the defence budget every year.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 9 in favour, 0 in between and 2 against.
-
Attal Strongly in favourChantier « Frontières », site de campagne attalpresident.fr (consulté le 19 octobre 2026) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly in favourProjet de Debout la France « Défense nationale », mis à jour le 8 octobre 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann Strongly in favour« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 9-11 Why
-
Le Pen Strongly in favourVote de Marine Le Pen à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 7905, 1er juillet 2026 Why
-
Lisnard Strongly in favourLes Grandes Gueules, RMC, 21 avril 2026, cité par Nouvelle Énergie Why
-
Mélenchon AgainstVote du groupe LFI-NFP à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 7905, 1er juillet 2026 Why
-
Philippe Strongly in favourPriorités « Pour une France plus sûre », site de campagne edouardphilippe.fr (consulté le 19 octobre 2026) Why
-
Retailleau Strongly in favour« L’unité nationale, première de nos armes », tribune reprise sur republicains.fr, 14 juillet 2026 Why
-
Roussel Strongly againstPCF, « 17 octobre et 5 novembre : ensemble, imposons de nouvelles conquêtes pour vivre mieux ! », 14 octobre 2026 Why
-
Tondelier In favourEntretien sur Public Sénat, 14 mars 2025 Why
-
Zemmour Strongly in favourBFMTV, « Face à BFM », 17 septembre 2026 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 3 of them the candidates hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test