🇪🇺 Issue
Europe: what each candidate thinks
By Fadrique Garcia Font · Reviewed on 19/10/2026
Whether French law should take precedence over European law, EU decisions by majority without a national veto, and leaving the European Union.
3 questions, 33 candidate positions and 2 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each candidate proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their programmes, statements and the votes of their party’s group. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”
Disagrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”; “France should leave the European Union”
Agrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”; “France should leave the European Union”
Disagrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”
Agrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”
Disagrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”; “France should leave the European Union”
Agrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”
Disagrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”; “France should leave the European Union”
Agrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”
Disagrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”; “France should leave the European Union”
Agrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”
Disagrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”; “France should leave the European Union”
Disagrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”; “France should leave the European Union”
In between: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”
Disagrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”; “France should leave the European Union”
In between: “French law should take precedence over European law”
Agrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”
Disagrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”; “France should leave the European Union”
Agrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”
Disagrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”; “France should leave the European Union”
Agrees: “French law should take precedence over European law”
Disagrees: “The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country”; “France should leave the European Union”
French law should take precedence over European law.
Under Article 55 of the Constitution, treaties, including European law, have authority over French laws.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 1 in between and 4 against.
-
Attal AgainstDiscours de Reims sur les États-Unis d’Europe, 17 septembre 2026, p. 10 Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly in favourProjet de Debout la France « Justice », mis à jour le 12 octobre 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann Against« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 12 Why
-
Le Pen Strongly in favourProgramme du RN aux européennes de 2024, p. 7 Why
-
Lisnard In favourProgramme de Nouvelle Énergie, page thématique « Immigration » (site du parti), et discours de Bayeux, 17 juin 2026, p. 10 Why
-
Mélenchon In favourL’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 17 (archive du 9 mai 2026) Why
-
Philippe AgainstDiscours du grand meeting de l’Adidas Arena, Paris, 5 juillet 2026 Why
-
Retailleau In between« En France, la seule cour suprême, c’est le peuple », entretien au Figaro repris sur republicains.fr, 2 septembre 2026 Why
-
Roussel In favour« Un communisme de conquêtes », base commune du 40e congrès du PCF, juillet 2026, § 2.1, p. 8 Why
-
Tondelier AgainstProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 60, mesure 1, p. 190 Why
-
Zemmour Strongly in favourProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 14 Why
The European Union should take more decisions by majority, without a veto for each country.
In several areas, such as foreign policy and taxation, EU decisions require unanimity: each member state can block them.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 3 in favour, 1 in between and 7 against.
-
Attal In favourTribune dans Le Figaro sur le retour du Royaume-Uni dans l’UE, 24 juin 2026 (compte rendu de campagne) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly againstProjet de Debout la France « Affaires européennes », mis à jour le 5 octobre 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann Strongly in favour« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 12 Why
-
Le Pen Strongly againstProgramme du RN aux européennes de 2024, p. 7 Why
-
Lisnard AgainstDiscours de Bayeux, 17 juin 2026, p. 11 Why
-
Mélenchon AgainstProgramme de La France insoumise pour les élections européennes de 2024, p. 15 et 95 Why
-
Philippe In between
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Retailleau Against« L’espace Schengen doit être réservé aux Européens ! », entretien au JDD repris sur republicains.fr, 2 août 2026 Why
-
Roussel Against« Un communisme de conquêtes », base commune du 40e congrès du PCF, juillet 2026, § 2.1, p. 8 Why
-
Tondelier Strongly in favourProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 60, mesure 1, p. 190 Why
-
Zemmour Strongly againstProgramme de Reconquête aux européennes de 2024, p. 8 Why
France should leave the European Union.
France is a founding member of the European project. A country can leave the Union under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 1 in favour, 0 in between and 10 against.
-
Attal Strongly againstDiscours de Reims sur les États-Unis d’Europe, 17 septembre 2026, p. 10 Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly in favourDiscours de rentrée « Libérons la France ! », 19 septembre 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann Strongly against« Lettre aux Français », place-publique.eu, 25 août 2026 Why
-
Le Pen AgainstLCP, 12 septembre 2026 Why
-
Lisnard Strongly againstDiscours de Bayeux, 17 juin 2026, p. 10 Why
-
Mélenchon AgainstL’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 17 (archive du 9 mai 2026) Why
-
Philippe Strongly againstDiscours au Conseil national d’Horizons, Reims, 10 mai 2026 Why
-
Retailleau Strongly against« En France, la seule cour suprême, c’est le peuple », entretien au Figaro repris sur republicains.fr, 2 septembre 2026 Why
-
Roussel Against« Un communisme de conquêtes », base commune du 40e congrès du PCF, juillet 2026, § 2.1, p. 8 Why
-
Tondelier Strongly againstProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 60, introduction, p. 189 Why
-
Zemmour AgainstProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 13 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 2 of them the candidates hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test