🎓 Issue
Education and youth: what each candidate thinks
By Fadrique Garcia Font · Reviewed on 19/10/2026
Banning social media for under-15s, school uniform in primary and lower secondary school, and the future of Parcoursup.
3 questions, 33 candidate positions and 1 complete disagreement (how they are assigned).
What each candidate proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their programmes, statements and the votes of their party’s group. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”
Disagrees: “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
In between: “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Agrees: “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Disagrees: “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
In between: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”
Agrees: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”
Disagrees: “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
In between: “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
Agrees: “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Disagrees: “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
In between: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”
Agrees: “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
In between: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”; “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Agrees: “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
Disagrees: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”; “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Agrees: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”
In between: “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”; “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
Agrees: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”; “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Disagrees: “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
Agrees: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”; “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
Disagrees: “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Agrees: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”; “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
Disagrees: “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Agrees: “School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school”
Disagrees: “Parcoursup should be scrapped”
In between: “Social media should be banned for children under 15”
Social media should be banned for children under 15.
In July 2026 the National Assembly passed a law providing for this ban. Critics question how effective it is and how age would be checked.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 4 in between and 1 against.
-
Attal Strongly in favourChantier « École », site de campagne attalpresident.fr (consulté le 19 octobre 2026) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan In between
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Glucksmann Strongly in favour« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 21 Why
-
Le Pen In betweenVote du groupe RN à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8431, 21 juillet 2026 Why
-
Lisnard In between
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Mélenchon AgainstVote du groupe LFI-NFP à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8431, 21 juillet 2026 Why
-
Philippe In favourVote du groupe Horizons & Indépendants à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8431, 21 juillet 2026 Why
-
Retailleau In favourVote de Bruno Retailleau au Sénat, scrutin n° 337, 21 juillet 2026 Why
-
Roussel In favourVote du groupe GDR à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8431, 21 juillet 2026 Why
-
Tondelier In favourVote du groupe Écologiste et Social à l’Assemblée nationale, scrutin n° 8431, 21 juillet 2026 Why
-
Zemmour In betweenProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 46 Why
School uniform should be compulsory in primary and lower secondary school.
A trial of a single school outfit has been running since 2024 in schools that opted in.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 3 in between and 4 against.
| Candidate | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Attal | In between | La Libre Belgique, « En France, l’uniforme expérimenté à l’école », 28 février 2024 Why |
| Dupont-Aignan | Strongly in favour | Projet de Debout la France « Éducation », mis à jour le 12 octobre 2026 Why |
| Glucksmann | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Le Pen | Strongly in favour | Programme présidentiel 2022, 22 mesures, p. 6 Why |
| Lisnard | In between | Estimated position Why |
| Mélenchon | Strongly against | L’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 5 (archive du 4 mai 2026) Why |
| Philippe | In between | Discours du grand meeting de l’Adidas Arena, Paris, 5 juillet 2026 Why |
| Retailleau | In favour | Sénat, proposition de loi n° 202 (2022-2023) visant à rendre obligatoire le port d’une tenue d’établissement scolaire, 13 décembre 2022 Why |
| Roussel | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Tondelier | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Zemmour | In favour | Programme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 22 Why |
-
Attal In betweenLa Libre Belgique, « En France, l’uniforme expérimenté à l’école », 28 février 2024 Why
-
Dupont-Aignan Strongly in favourProjet de Debout la France « Éducation », mis à jour le 12 octobre 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Le Pen Strongly in favourProgramme présidentiel 2022, 22 mesures, p. 6 Why
-
Lisnard In between
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Mélenchon Strongly againstL’Avenir en commun, édition 2025, chap. 5 (archive du 4 mai 2026) Why
-
Philippe In betweenDiscours du grand meeting de l’Adidas Arena, Paris, 5 juillet 2026 Why
-
Retailleau In favourSénat, proposition de loi n° 202 (2022-2023) visant à rendre obligatoire le port d’une tenue d’établissement scolaire, 13 décembre 2022 Why
-
Roussel Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Tondelier Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Zemmour In favourProgramme présidentiel 2022 « Pour que la France reste la France », p. 22 Why
Parcoursup should be scrapped.
Since 2018 Parcoursup has been the national platform that handles admission to higher education after the baccalauréat.
Of the 11 candidates with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 2 in between and 5 against.
-
Attal AgainstMesures présentées au meeting de Lyon, 10 octobre 2026 (site de campagne) Why
-
Dupont-Aignan AgainstProjet de Debout la France « Éducation », mis à jour le 12 octobre 2026 Why
-
Glucksmann In between« Notre vision pour la France », programme de Place publique (Acte I), mars 2026, p. 25 Why
-
Le Pen Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Lisnard In favourProgramme de Nouvelle Énergie, page thématique « Santé » (site du parti) Why
-
Mélenchon Strongly in favourComment nous allons remettre de l’ordre dans les comptes publics, octobre 2026, p. 9 Why
-
Philippe In betweenfranceinfo, compte rendu de « L’Heure de vérité » (France 2), 8 octobre 2026 Why
-
Retailleau AgainstProgramme de Valérie Pécresse (LR), « Le courage de faire », 2022, p. 8 Why
-
Roussel Strongly in favourPCF, « 17 octobre et 5 novembre : ensemble, imposons de nouvelles conquêtes pour vivre mieux ! », 14 octobre 2026 Why
-
Tondelier In favourProgramme des Écologistes « Pour une prospérité écologique », juillet 2026, chap. 24, mesure 1, p. 93 Why
-
Zemmour Against
Estimated position: inferred from the candidate’s overall programme and statements, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 1 of them the candidates hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test